Defective Product Lawyer Brooklyn, NY

When a defectively designed or manufactured product causes serious injury in Brooklyn, the physical, financial, and emotional consequences can be severe. Defective product claims arise from a broad range of consumer and industrial goods—auto parts, household appliances, power tools, medical devices, children’s products, and more. If a manufacturer, distributor, or retailer placed an unreasonably dangerous product into the stream of commerce and someone is hurt, New York law provides a path to recover damages. At Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys concentrate on holding responsible parties accountable for injuries caused by defective products in Kings County and throughout the New York City area. Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor, founded the firm in 1997 and brings decades of litigation experience to product-liability matters. Under New York law, a personal injury claim for a defective product must generally be commenced within three years from the date of injury (N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5)). Evidence can degrade, and manufacturers often move quickly to assess the incident, so contacting an attorney promptly is a practical step to preserve both evidence and legal rights. To request a consultation about a defective product injury, reach Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On This Page

What Defective Product Claims Mean in Brooklyn, NY

Product liability litigation in Brooklyn proceeds primarily in the Supreme Court, Kings County, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. The court is part of New York’s Second Judicial District and has unlimited civil jurisdiction, so claims involving substantial injuries—traumatic brain injury, spinal cord damage, amputation, or multiple surgeries—can be filed there without jurisdictional dollar caps. Brooklyn’s dense population, extensive transportation infrastructure, and diverse commercial activity mean that a wide array of products—from e‑scooters and e‑bikes to building materials and industrial machinery—regularly reach consumers in the borough. When one of those products fails because of a design defect, a manufacturing flaw, or inadequate warnings, the injured person may have a cause of action grounded in strict liability, negligence, or breach of warranty.

Under New York’s strict products liability doctrine, a plaintiff does not need to prove the manufacturer was careless; showing that the product was unreasonably dangerous for its intended or reasonably foreseeable use may be enough. New York also recognizes claims for manufacturing defects (the product deviated from its intended design), design defects (the entire line carries an unreasonable risk), and failure‑to‑warn (inadequate instructions or warnings for foreseeable dangers). Importantly, New York applies a pure comparative fault rule (N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411). Even if the injured person is partly responsible—for example, using the product in a manner the manufacturer says the jury should have foreseen—damages are reduced by the percentage of fault rather than barred entirely. The interplay between strict liability and comparative fault makes early evidence preservation critical: the product itself, packaging, instructions, and digital records must be secured before they are lost or altered.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Defective Product Cases

Every defective product investigation begins with the product itself. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work with engineering and safety attorneys to examine the item, review design history and manufacturing records, and determine whether a defect existed when the product left the defendant’s control. The firm also gathers medical records to link the injury to the defect and works with economists and life-care planners when future medical needs or lost earning capacity are at issue. Because manufacturers and their insurers often deploy their own experienced attorney teams immediately after an incident, acting quickly to preserve the physical evidence can level the field.

The firm handles correspondence with insurance representatives, identifies all potentially liable parties—designers, component manufacturers, distributors, and retailers—and manages discovery, including document production and depositions. If a reasonable settlement cannot be reached, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are prepared to try the case before a jury in Kings County Supreme Court. Throughout the process, the client stays informed about the strengths and risks of the claim so that decisions about accepting an offer or proceeding to verdict are made with a clear understanding of the record.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor who established the firm in 1997. He is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and he has testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). His litigation background includes complex civil matters, and he brings that experience to defective product claims for clients in Brooklyn and across the firm’s multi‑state footprint.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys—experienced litigators in their own right—handle cases collaboratively under the firm’s structure. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience to product‑liability matters, including work with accident reconstruction, biomechanics, and materials‑failure attorneys. Results may vary.

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as a defective product under New York law?

A product may be considered defective in New York if it is designed, manufactured, or marketed in a way that makes it unreasonably dangerous for its intended use. Design defects are flaws in the product’s blueprint that affect every unit in the line; manufacturing defects are one‑off deviations from the specifications; and marketing defects occur when warnings or instructions are inadequate. A claim does not require proof of manufacturer negligence—strict liability can apply if the product reached the user without a substantial change in condition and caused injury when it was used in a reasonably foreseeable manner. Expert testimony from engineers, industrial designers, and human‑factors attorney is often central to establishing the defect.

How long do I have to file a defective product claim in Brooklyn?

In New York, a personal injury claim arising from a defective product must generally be commenced within three years from the date the injury occurred (N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5)). Wrongful‑death claims have a two‑year limitations period (N.Y. E.P.T.L. § 5‑4.1). Different timelines may apply if the defendant is a governmental entity, so moving quickly to evaluate the applicable deadline is important. Even if the three‑year window seems generous, evidence—especially the product itself—can be lost or altered, and witness memories fade. Contacting an attorney early helps ensure that the necessary investigation can begin while the evidence is intact.

What types of damages can I recover in a defective product case?

Injured plaintiffs in New York may seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, future earning capacity, pain and suffering, and other economic and non‑economic losses. New York does not place a statutory cap on compensatory damages in most personal injury cases, so recoverable damages are driven by the facts of the injury. If a product caused permanent disability or required long‑term care, life‑care planners and vocational attorneys can quantify the future costs. Under New York’s pure comparative fault rule, if the injured person is found partially at fault, any recovery is reduced by that percentage, but it is not eliminated unless the plaintiff is found to be 100 percent responsible.

Do I need a lawyer for a defective product injury in Brooklyn?

While you are not legally required to hire an attorney, product‑liability claims are factually and technically complex, and manufacturers almost always are represented by experienced defense teams. Proving a defect typically demands expert testimony, and gathering the necessary design and manufacturing records often requires formal discovery. An attorney who is familiar with Kings County Supreme Court procedures can handle the procedural steps—filing the complaint, serving parties, conducting depositions, and moving the case toward trial or settlement—so that the injured person can focus on recovery. A consultation with an attorney allows you to understand whether your claim has merit and what evidence may be needed.

How does the firm investigate a defective product claim?

The investigation begins by securing the product, its packaging, and any instructions or receipts. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys then retain attorneys—mechanical engineers, metallurgists, or human‑factors attorney—to examine the item and compare it against the design specifications. Manufacturing records, quality‑control reports, and prior incident data are requested through discovery. Medical records are collected to document the injury and its cause. The goal is to build a record that connects the defect to the harm in a way that is admissible at trial.

What does it cost to hire a defective product attorney?

Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Typically handles personal injury matters on a contingency‑fee basis, meaning the firm receives a fee only if it obtains a recovery for you. The fee is a percentage of the settlement or judgment, and the percentage is governed by New York court rules. Costs such as filing fees and expert witness expenses are separate and are usually advanced by the firm during the case. There is no upfront payment for the firm’s legal services. To get specific information about how the arrangement would apply to your situation, call (888) 437-7747 to request a consultation.

Primary sources:
New York CPLR § 214 |
New York State Unified Court System |
Kings County Supreme Court

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.
Results may vary.